Electricity Load & Renewable Forecasting

A comparative analysis of LSTM, GRU, and TCN Models for short-term load forecasting in renewable-rich German power grids.

Back to Home

Project Overview

As power systems integrate increasing amounts of wind and solar generation, short-term load forecasting is critical for maintaining grid stability and minimizing balancing costs. This project forecasts hourly electricity load in Germany utilizing modern Deep Learning architectures.

By building a multivariate time series that combined historical load with onshore wind, solar generation, and calendar features, we structured a pipeline to evaluate the most resource-efficient layout between Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Gated Recurrent Units (GRU), and Temporal Convolutional Networks (TCN).

Methodology & Data Processing

The system was trained off of Open Power System Data (OPSD). Operational data inherently contains noise and gaps, requiring rigorous preparation pipelines:

  • Time-Based Interpolation: Missing values were handled via continuous time-based forward and backward filling to retain temporal validity.
  • Standardization: Scaling features to stabilize model optimization and avoid neural bias toward large values without causing cross-set data leakage.
  • Sliding-Window Sequences: Structured to capture the previous 24 hours of system conditions (load, solar, wind, & calendar features) to predict the next 24 hours chronologically using Keras input shapes.

Architectural Evaluation

Three models were benchmarked to identify optimal operational deployments:

  • LSTM Baseline: Yielded the lowest configuration stability and underestimated peak loads, serving generally as an architecture foundation.
  • Temporal Convolutional Networks (TCN): Replaced recurrence with stacks of 1D causal dilated convolutions. Exploiting Bayesian Optimization, the TCN delivered strong competitive accuracy and executed up to 3.5× faster.
  • Multivariate GRU (Winner): The 64-unit stacked GRU model seamlessly handled massive predictive deviations and accurately tracked fluctuating drops and ramps over test data.
Key Architectural Finding: Including wind and solar variations produced an improvement of over 16.5% relative to estimating standard load histories, proving standard univariate predictions in modern grids are inadequate.

Results & Impact

463 MW (Mean Absolute Error)
601 MW (Root Mean Squared Error)

The multivariate GRU emerged as the most resilient model overall, whereas the TCN offered a powerful accuracy-efficiency trade-off for time-critical deployments. Such frameworks supply crucial unit commitments for regional grids integrating renewable resources at exponential scales.